Logo

ASTM E1921-05

Historical Revision

Standard Test Method for Determination of Reference Temperature, <emph type="bdit">T<inf >0</inf></emph>, for Ferritic Steels in the Transition Range

$91.00

$91.00

$163.80


Sub Total (1 Item(s))

$ 0.00

Estimated Shipping

$ 0.00

Total (Pre-Tax)

$ 0.00


Document Preview Not Available...

1.1 This test method covers the determination of a reference temperature, To, which characterizes the fracture toughness of ferritic steels that experience onset of cleavage cracking at elastic, or elastic-plastic KJc instabilities, or both. The specific types of ferritic steels () covered are those with yield strengths ranging from 275 to 825 MPa (40 to 120 ksi) and weld metals, after stress-relief annealing, that have 10 % or less strength mismatch relative to that of the base metal.

1.2 The specimens covered are fatigue precracked single-edge notched bend bars, SE(B), and standard or disk-shaped compact tension specimens, C(T) or DC(T). A range of specimen sizes with proportional dimensions is recommended. The dimension on which the proportionality is based is specimen thickness.

1.3 Median KJc values tend to vary with the specimen type at a given test temperature, presumably due to constraint differences among the allowable test specimens in . The degree of KJc variability among specimen types is analytically predicted to be a function of the material flow properties (1) and decreases with increasing strain hardening capacity for a given yield strength material. This KJc dependency ultimately leads to discrepancies in calculated To values as a function of specimen type for the same material. To values obtained from C(T) specimens are expected to be higher than To values obtained from SE(B) specimens. Best estimate comparisons of several materials indicate that the average difference between C(T) and SE(B)-derived T o values is approximately 10C (2). C(T) and SE(B) To differences up to 15C have also been recorded (3). However, comparisons of individual, small datasets may not necessarily reveal this average trend. Datasets which contain both C(T) and SE(B) specimens may generate To results which fall between the T o values calculated using solely C(T) or SE(B) specimens. It is therefore strongly recommended that the specimen type be reported along with the derived To value in all reporting, analysis, and discussion of results. This recommended reporting is in addition to the requirements in .

1.4 Requirements are set on specimen size and the number of replicate tests that are needed to establish acceptable characterization of KJc data populations.

1.5 The statistical effects of specimen size on KJc in the transition range are treated using weakest-link theory () applied to a three-parameter Weibull distribution of fracture toughness values. A limit on KJc values, relative to the specimen size, is specified to ensure high constraint conditions along the crack front at fracture. For some materials, particularly those with low strain hardening, this limit may not be sufficient to ensure that a single-parameter (KJc) adequately describes the crack-front deformation state ().

1.6 Statistical methods are employed to predict the transition toughness curve and specified tolerance bounds for 1T specimens of the material tested. The standard deviation of the data distribution is a function of Weibull slope and median KJc. The procedure for applying this information to the establishment of transition temperature shift determinations and the establishment of tolerance limits is prescribed.

1.7 The fracture toughness evaluation of nonuniform material is not amenable to the statistical analysis methods employed in this standard. Materials must have macroscopically uniform tensile and toughness properties. For example, multipass weldments can create heat-affected and brittle zones with localized properties that are quite different from either the bulk material or weld. Thick section steel also often exhibits some variation in properties near the surfaces. Metallography and initial screening may be necessary to verify the applicability of these and similarly graded materials. Paticular notice should be given to the 2% and 98% tolerance bounds on K Jc presented in . Data falling outside these bounds may indicate nonuniform material properties.

This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.


SDO ASTM: ASTM International
Document Number E1921
Publication Date Jan. 1, 2005
Language en - English
Page Count 20
Revision Level 05
Supercedes
Committee E08.07
Publish Date Document Id Type View
May 1, 2024 E1921-24 Revision
Dec. 15, 2023 E1921-23B Revision
Nov. 1, 2023 E1921-23A Revision
June 1, 2023 E1921-23 Revision
Nov. 1, 2022 E1921-22A Revision
July 15, 2022 E1921-22 Revision
Oct. 1, 2021 E1921-21A Revision
May 15, 2021 E1921-21 Revision
June 1, 2020 E1921-20 Revision
July 15, 2019 E1921-19BE01 Revision
July 15, 2019 E1921-19B Revision
May 1, 2019 E1921-19A Revision
Feb. 1, 2019 E1921-19 Revision
June 1, 2018 E1921-18A Revision
Jan. 15, 2018 E1921-18 Revision
April 15, 2017 E1921-17A Revision
Jan. 1, 2017 E1921-17 Revision
May 15, 2016 E1921-16 Revision
Oct. 1, 2015 E1921-15AE01 Revision
Oct. 1, 2015 E1921-15A Revision
Feb. 1, 2015 E1921-15 Revision
Dec. 15, 2014 E1921-14A Revision
Aug. 1, 2014 E1921-14 Revision
Nov. 15, 2013 E1921-13A Revision
Jan. 1, 2013 E1921-13 Revision
Nov. 15, 2012 E1921-12A Revision
May 1, 2012 E1921-12 Revision
Oct. 1, 2011 E1921-11A Revision
May 1, 2011 E1921-11 Revision
May 1, 2010 E1921-10E01 Revision
May 1, 2010 E1921-10 Revision
June 15, 2009 E1921-09CE02 Revision
June 15, 2009 E1921-09CE01 Revision
June 15, 2009 E1921-09C Revision
June 1, 2009 E1921-09B Revision
Feb. 15, 2009 E1921-09A Revision
Jan. 1, 2009 E1921-09 Revision
May 15, 2008 E1921-08AE01 Revision
May 15, 2008 E1921-08A Revision
Jan. 15, 2008 E1921-08 Revision
Dec. 15, 2007 E1921-07 Revision
Jan. 1, 2005 E1921-05 Revision
Nov. 1, 2003 E1921-03 Revision
March 10, 2002 E1921-97 Revision
March 10, 2002 E1921-02 Revision