Loading...
1.1 These test methods cover the fracture toughness, KIc, determination of advanced ceramics at ambient temperature. The methods determine KIpb (precracked beam test specimen), KIsc (surface crack in flexure), and KIvb (chevron-notched beam test specimen). The fracture toughness values are determined using beam test specimens with a sharp crack. The crack is either a straight-through crack formed via bridge flexure (pb), or a semi-elliptical surface crack formed via Knoop indentation (sc), or it is formed and propagated in a chevron notch (vb), as shown in Fig. 1.
Note 1: The figures on the right show the test specimen cross sections and crack types. Four-point loading may be used with all three methods. Three-point may be used with the pb and vb specimens.
Note 1: The terms bend(ing) and flexure are synonymous in these test methods.
1.2 These test methods are applicable to materials with either flat or with rising R-curves. Differences in test procedure and analysis may cause the values from each test method to be different. For many materials, such as the silicon nitride Standard Reference Material 2100, the three methods give identical results at room temperature in ambient air.
1.3 The fracture toughness values for a material can be functions of environment, test rate and temperature. These test methods give fracture toughness values for specific conditions of environment, test rate and temperature.
1.4 These test methods are intended primarily for use with advanced ceramics that are macroscopically homogeneous and microstructurally dense. Certain whisker- or particle-reinforced ceramics may also meet the macroscopic behavior assumptions. Single crystals may also be tested.
1.5 This standard begins with a main body that provides information on fracture toughness testing in general. It is followed by annexes and appendices with specific information for the particular test methods.
| Main Body | Section |
| Scope | 1 |
| Referenced Documents | 2 |
| Terminology (including definitions, orientation and symbols) | 3 |
| Summary of Test Methods | 4 |
| Significance and Use | 5 |
| Interferences | 6 |
| Apparatus | 7 |
| Test Specimen Configurations, Dimensions and Preparations | 8 |
| General Procedures | 9 |
| Report (including reporting tables) | 10 |
| Precision and Bias | 11 |
| Keywords | 12 |
| Summary of Changes |
|
| Annexes |
|
| Test Fixture Geometries | Annex A1 |
| Procedures and Special Requirements for Precracked Beam Method | Annex A2 |
| Procedures and Special Requirements for Surface Crack in Flexure Method | Annex A3 |
| Procedures and Special Requirements for Chevron Notch Flexure Method | Annex A4 |
| Appendices |
|
| Precrack Characterization, Surface Crack in Flexure Method | Appendix X1 |
| Complications in Interpreting Surface Crack in Flexure Precracks | Appendix X2 |
| Alternative Precracking Procedure, Surface Crack in Flexure Method | Appendix X3 |
| Chamfer Correction Factors, Surface Crack in Flexure Method Only | Appendix X4 |
| Crack Orientation | Appendix X5 |
1.6 Values expressed in these test methods are in accordance with the International System of Units (SI) and Practice IEEE/ASTM SI 10.
1.7 The values stated in SI units are to be regarded as standard. No other units of measurement are included in this standard.
1.8 This standard does not purport to address all of the safety concerns, if any, associated with its use. It is the responsibility of the user of this standard to establish appropriate safety and health practices and determine the applicability of regulatory limitations prior to use.
5.1 Fracture toughness, KIc, is a measure of the resistance to crack extension in a brittle material. These test methods may be used for material development, material comparison, quality assessment, and characterization.
5.2 The pb and the vb fracture toughness values provide information on the fracture resistance of advanced ceramics containing large sharp cracks, while the sc fracture toughness value provides this information for small cracks comparable in size to natural fracture sources. Cracks of different sizes may be used for the sc method. If the fracture toughness values vary as a function of the crack size it can be expected that KIsc will differ from KIpb and KIvb. Table 1 tabulates advantages, disadvantages, and applicability of each method.
| SDO | ASTM: ASTM International |
| Document Number | C1421 |
| Publication Date | Jan. 1, 2016 |
| Language | en - English |
| Page Count | 33 |
| Revision Level | 16 |
| Supercedes | |
| Committee | C28.01 |
We're glad to see you again! Please enter your email and password to continue
Need an account?
Register for an account to join our community! Gain access to exclusive content, participate in discussions, and stay updated on the latest news.
Have an account?
Forgot your password? No worries! Please enter your email to reset your password. If your email exists in our system, you will receive a password reset link.
Have an account?
We've sent an email to reset your password if an account with that email exists. Please check your inbox and follow the instructions in the email. If you don't see the email, please check your spam folder.
We have sent a verification email to you. Please check your inbox and follow the instructions in the email to verify your account. If you don't see the email, please check your spam folder.